![]() |
Quality Of Work. Managing projects “of quality”Translation of Calidad
del trabajo. Gestionar proyectos “con calidad” by
Miguel
Ángel Portoles> published in VERSIÓNCERØ [Note by the translator: it has been fashionable in recent
years to use the word 'quality' as an adjective, such as in 'quality
procedures'. In this usage 'quality' means something like 'made
according to documented procedures' or 'what the customer wrote that
she wanted' or appropriate for the documented purpose. I am using the
term 'of quality' in this article to reflect what most people mean by
the word, as something 'good' in an undefinable way. You know it
when you see it. Something that delights the customer.] Is it possible to bring “quality” to the management
of a project? This article suggests some ideas for achieving this
goal. Managing a project according to quality procedures can become
tortuous and can make you feel like a copist monk of the middle ages. I am not denying the need to apply quality procedures to one's
work, and I am convinced of the need for methodologies (if I even
have a methodology for shaving, why should I not have methodologies
for working with software and hardware), but what some quality
departments have not fully come to terms with is that following a
quality system is not the same as achieving work of quality. They are
not related. In my working life I have discovered a strange law: the size of
the company is directly proportional to the internal documentation
that needs to be produced during the work. In case this law does not
already exist and you want to quote it, you can call it "Portoles' law
of the management of quality projects". It may be that the ideas I am going to share below are already in
some “ISO some thousand”. But they are hidden amongst
millions of other phrases, inspired by the natural desire to codify
and to normalise, that try to ensure that the statements that apply to a
fast food company will apply equally to a software development
company or a consultancy. In the race by companies to collect
certifications or hard evidence, my personal experience has been that
obtaining a certificate is more an act of will (and paying for it)
than having and following quality practices. Here are some ideas for achieving what I consider to be work of
quality: To start with, the sale has probably been closed without the
full facts being disclosed. The idea sold by the salesman has been
exaggerated; he has said yes to everything. You have to start by
checking what needs to be done and agreeing a definition of the
product with an appropriate representative of the client, then
bringing this to the in-house technical team. The definition of the product implies writing it down. The
principles of all methodologies, and our own laziness, have left us
with a certain “mania” for documenting things. My
experience is that it doesn't take that much time. We shouldn't be
afraid to document things when necessary. The real communication
within the project will have a written document as its end result. It is necessary to show to the client what she will get from
the project in a way which she can understand and to get her
agreement and feedback. This may be in small doses, starting from a
high level view and detailing each of the parts into which we can
decompose it. It is important to provide enough information and
assistance so that the client can validate the proposal. The project team should participate in the planning of the
project and the definition of the tasks in the detail that is
appropriate. The team must review the choice of methodology for the
work, including participating in its definition if possible. At the end of the project, the project team should perform a
review of the project, highlighting the most important successes and
the problems that they overcame. In this way we can address another
of the concepts that is so fashionable, knowledge management. None of these ideas is revolutionary, all of them are mundane and
completely understood. I believe that doing work of quality consists
in knowing what is appropriate and everyday. Continuous improvement
is the search for that little action that is better than another, and
once found, its introduction into the normal everyday way of working. |
Return to Extracts from Planeta Código E-mail comments to: |
TrickyDicky |
© 2005-6 |